SU v. HAAG, 3:14-cv-03540 (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140903i02
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2014
Summary: [proposed] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, Magistrate Judge. After careful consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss Melinda Haag, Michael Pittman and the United States filed by the plaintiff and the United States, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Melinda Haag (the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California) and Michael Pittman (an Assistant United States Attorney) are dismissed, in both their official and personal capacities, from this case with prejudice; 2. the United States is
Summary: [proposed] ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, Magistrate Judge. After careful consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss Melinda Haag, Michael Pittman and the United States filed by the plaintiff and the United States, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Melinda Haag (the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California) and Michael Pittman (an Assistant United States Attorney) are dismissed, in both their official and personal capacities, from this case with prejudice; 2. the United States is d..
More
[proposed] ORDER
VINCE CHHABRIA, Magistrate Judge.
After careful consideration of the Stipulation to Dismiss Melinda Haag, Michael Pittman and the United States filed by the plaintiff and the United States, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Melinda Haag (the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California) and Michael Pittman (an Assistant United States Attorney) are dismissed, in both their official and personal capacities, from this case with prejudice;
2. the United States is dismissed from this case with prejudice; and
3. this case is remanded to the Superior Court of California (Sonoma County) for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
