TRI-STATE GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION, 13-00085 KG/LAM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20140826a34
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Occidental Permian Ltd.'s Motion to Amend its Motion to Intervene (Motion to Amend), filed August 4, 2014. (Doc. 81). Occidental Permian Ltd. seeks to amend its motion to intervene for the sole purpose of including its proposed answer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). Plaintiff Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. does not object to amending the motion to intervene to include the proposed
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Occidental Permian Ltd.'s Motion to Amend its Motion to Intervene (Motion to Amend), filed August 4, 2014. (Doc. 81). Occidental Permian Ltd. seeks to amend its motion to intervene for the sole purpose of including its proposed answer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). Plaintiff Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. does not object to amending the motion to intervene to include the proposed ..
More
ORDER
KENNETH J. GONZALES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon Occidental Permian Ltd.'s Motion to Amend its Motion to Intervene (Motion to Amend), filed August 4, 2014. (Doc. 81). Occidental Permian Ltd. seeks to amend its motion to intervene for the sole purpose of including its proposed answer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). Plaintiff Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. does not object to amending the motion to intervene to include the proposed answer, but it does note that Occidental Permian, Ltd. did not comply with D.N.M. LR-Cv 7.1(a) which requires a "recitation of a good-faith request for concurrence" before filing a motion. See (Doc. 83). In light of Occidental Permian Ltd.'s failure to comply with both Rule 24(c) and Local Rule 7.1(a), the Court admonishes Occidental Permian Ltd. to fully comply with both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules or else face possible future sanctions.
IT IS ORDERED that Occidental Permian Ltd.'s Motion to Amend its Motion to Intervene (Doc. 81) is granted.
Source: Leagle
