Six4three, LLC v. FACEBOOK, INC., C 17-00359 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170216967
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2017
Summary: REQUEST FOR FURTHER RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Facebook has withdrawn its opposition to Six4Three's motion to remand in light of Six4Three's unequivocal statement that it would not rely on federal law in support of its Section 17200 claim. Counsel for Six4Three contacted the Court's deputy, asking whether the hearing on the pending motion would be vacated. Although all now agree that the action should be remanded, Six4Three has not withdrawn its request for fee
Summary: REQUEST FOR FURTHER RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Facebook has withdrawn its opposition to Six4Three's motion to remand in light of Six4Three's unequivocal statement that it would not rely on federal law in support of its Section 17200 claim. Counsel for Six4Three contacted the Court's deputy, asking whether the hearing on the pending motion would be vacated. Although all now agree that the action should be remanded, Six4Three has not withdrawn its request for fees..
More
REQUEST FOR FURTHER RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Facebook has withdrawn its opposition to Six4Three's motion to remand in light of Six4Three's unequivocal statement that it would not rely on federal law in support of its Section 17200 claim. Counsel for Six4Three contacted the Court's deputy, asking whether the hearing on the pending motion would be vacated. Although all now agree that the action should be remanded, Six4Three has not withdrawn its request for fees and costs incurred as a result of removal. By 2:00 P.M. TODAY, Six4Three shall state whether it withdraws its requests for fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
