COTTER v. LYFT, INC., 13-cv-04065-VC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170317a72
Visitors: 32
Filed: Mar. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING OBJECTORS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES Re: Dkt. No. 265 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The motion by the Teamsters for attorneys' fees is denied. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 , 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). Although the benefits to the class members were substantially enhanced from the original settlement to the current one, this was largely the result of the standard process for district court review rather than the objections filed by the Teamsters, which were la
Summary: ORDER DENYING OBJECTORS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES Re: Dkt. No. 265 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The motion by the Teamsters for attorneys' fees is denied. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 , 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). Although the benefits to the class members were substantially enhanced from the original settlement to the current one, this was largely the result of the standard process for district court review rather than the objections filed by the Teamsters, which were lar..
More
ORDER DENYING OBJECTORS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
Re: Dkt. No. 265
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The motion by the Teamsters for attorneys' fees is denied. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, 1052 (9th Cir. 2002). Although the benefits to the class members were substantially enhanced from the original settlement to the current one, this was largely the result of the standard process for district court review rather than the objections filed by the Teamsters, which were largely rejected.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
