(PC) Dell v. Espinoza,, 1:16-cv-1769-DAD-MJS (PC). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171206b31
Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 29) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending is Plaintiff's motion to compel the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide information to effectuate service on Defendant Correctional Officer R. Espinoza. Since this Defendant has now been served and filed an answer ( see ECF Nos.
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 29) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending is Plaintiff's motion to compel the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide information to effectuate service on Defendant Correctional Officer R. Espinoza. Since this Defendant has now been served and filed an answer ( see ECF Nos. ..
More
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
(ECF NO. 29)
MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending is Plaintiff's motion to compel the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide information to effectuate service on Defendant Correctional Officer R. Espinoza. Since this Defendant has now been served and filed an answer (see ECF Nos. 31-32), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 29) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
