HICKMAN v. CITY OF BERKELEY, C 11-04395(EDL). (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141110625
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LaPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge. On November 3, 2014, Defendant filed a Noticed of Inability to Comply with the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. On November 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. Also on November 4, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff to show why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with p
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LaPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge. On November 3, 2014, Defendant filed a Noticed of Inability to Comply with the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. On November 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. Also on November 4, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff to show why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with pr..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH D. LaPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge.
On November 3, 2014, Defendant filed a Noticed of Inability to Comply with the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. On November 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Court's October 20, 2014 Order regarding arbitration. Also on November 4, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff to show why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with previous orders regarding the arbitration process. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Objection no later than November 11, 2014. Plaintiff's response to the Order to Show Cause remains due no November 18, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
