Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 4:10-cv-04892-RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130423915 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES' RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties, by and through undersigned counsel, have conferred and hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court grant a continuance to the hearing date for the parties' Renewed Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The hearing date is currently scheduled for Thursday, April 25, 2
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES' RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties, by and through undersigned counsel, have conferred and hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court grant a continuance to the hearing date for the parties' Renewed Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The hearing date is currently scheduled for Thursday, April 25, 2013, and the parties request the hearing be continued to Thursday, May 30, 2013.

The parties seek this continuance because Plaintiff's counsel's grandmother passed away today, and plaintiff's counsel needs to travel to be with family and to help her family with the logistics surrounding her grandmother's death. Defendant's counsel's schedule is full with other matters throughout the month of May, and so May 30, 2013 is the first date both counsel will be available.

This requested change will minimally affect the present schedule for the case because the Renewed Cross Motions are fully briefed and because it will only extend the hearing date by about a month.

DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1

I, Jennifer Lynch, hereby declare pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 that I have obtained Defendant's concurrence in the filing of this document from Nicholas Cartier, Counsel for Defendant.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer