Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moody v. Saul, CIV-19-413-HE. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma Number: infdco20200224c53 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER JOE HEATON , District Judge . In this action, plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") that plaintiff was not disabled under the terms of the Social Security Act. On January 30, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recom
More

ORDER

In this action, plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") that plaintiff was not disabled under the terms of the Social Security Act. On January 30, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by February 19, 2020.

Neither party objected to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the parties have waived their rights to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Cassanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #20] and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer