Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LOCH HARBOUR GROUP, INC. v. U.S., 14-922C. (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20141121b75 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER ERIC G. BRUGGINK, Judge. Pending is defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). Plaintiff does not oppose the motion because the agency took corrective action, which affords plaintiff the relief it sought and renders plaintiff's case moot. Thus, we hereby grant defendant's unopposed motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's mo
More

ORDER

ERIC G. BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending is defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). Plaintiff does not oppose the motion because the agency took corrective action, which affords plaintiff the relief it sought and renders plaintiff's case moot. Thus, we hereby grant defendant's unopposed motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record is also rendered moot and is denied. Intervenor's motion to stay is likewise denied as moot. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order. No costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer