Palmer v. Iosefa, 1:16-cv-00787-SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180910566
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF'S SUPERVISORY LIABILITY CLAIM (THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . At the pretrial conference held September 5, 2018, the parties stipulated on the record to the dismissal of Plaintiff's supervisory liability claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Third Claim for Relief), with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may di
Summary: ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF'S SUPERVISORY LIABILITY CLAIM (THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . At the pretrial conference held September 5, 2018, the parties stipulated on the record to the dismissal of Plaintiff's supervisory liability claim under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (Third Claim for Relief), with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dis..
More
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF'S SUPERVISORY LIABILITY CLAIM (THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
At the pretrial conference held September 5, 2018, the parties stipulated on the record to the dismissal of Plaintiff's supervisory liability claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Third Claim for Relief), with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing. . . (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). "The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of his claims" through a Rule 41(a)(1) stipulation. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Such stipulation may be made orally in open court. See Carter v. Beverly Hills Sav. & Loan Asso., 884 F.2d 1186, 1191 (9th Cir. 1989); Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986).
Because the parties orally stipulated in open court to the dismissal of Plaintiff's supervisory liability claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Third Claim for Relief), with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that claim has been DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).
This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
