U.S. v. SANTIAGO, 5:08-cr-28/RS (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120426930
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 91) and the Defendant's Objections (Doc. 94). I have considered the objections de novo. IT IS ORDERED : 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The Government's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's 2255 motion (Doc. 79) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 91) and the Defendant's Objections (Doc. 94). I have considered the objections de novo. IT IS ORDERED : 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The Government's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's 2255 motion (Doc. 79) is GRANTED. 3. Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U..
More
ORDER
RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.
Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 91) and the Defendant's Objections (Doc. 94). I have considered the objections de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The Government's Motion to Dismiss Defendant's §2255 motion (Doc. 79) is GRANTED.
3. Defendant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 77) is DISMISSED as untimely.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right.
Source: Leagle
