Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Donofrio v. IKEA US Retail, LLC, 2:18-cv-00599-AB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20191220g98 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ANITA B. BRODY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 19th day of December, 2019, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Order of June 26, 2019 (ECF No. 82) denying Defendant's Motion for Clarification and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply is VACATED . 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (ECF No. 80) is GRANTED . Plaintiff's surreply is deemed filed. 3. Defendant's Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART . Accordin
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Order of June 26, 2019 (ECF No. 82) denying Defendant's Motion for Clarification and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply is VACATED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (ECF No. 80) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's surreply is deemed filed. 3. Defendant's Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 72) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Accordingly, the Order of May 15, 2019 (ECF No. 71) is MODIFIED as follows: "1. Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification (ECF Nos. 35, 36, and 62) is GRANTED. This case will proceed pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (incorporated by 29 U.S.C. § 626(b)). Any current hourly retail non-management employee of IKEA who, between January 20, 2016 and November 29, 2017, was age 40 or over and was rejected for promotion to a management level position, may opt in to this lawsuit as a Plaintiff."
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer