Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2015
Summary: PER CURIAM . We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Harris, 129 So.3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and P
Summary: PER CURIAM . We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Harris, 129 So.3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PE..
More
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Harris, 129 So.3d 1166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
