Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Skare v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6:17-cv-1840-Orl-37DCI. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180718979 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL C. IRICK , Magistrate Judge . This cause comes before the Court for consideration without oral argument on the following motion: MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(G) WITH REVERSAL AND REMAND OF THE CAUSE TO DEFENDANT (Doc. 18) FILED: July 6, 2018 ___________________________________________________________ THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. On July 6, 2018, the Commissioner of S
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause comes before the Court for consideration without oral argument on the following motion:

MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G) WITH REVERSAL AND REMAND OF THE CAUSE TO DEFENDANT (Doc. 18) FILED: July 6, 2018 ___________________________________________________________ THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED.

On July 6, 2018, the Commissioner of Social Security filed a motion for entry of judgment with remand (the Motion). Doc. 18. In the Motion, the Commissioner states that:

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will affirm the Administrative Law Judge's finding that the claimant was disabled beginning November 1, 2016. For the period prior to November 1, 2016, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to obtain medical expert opinion evidence, reevaluate the opinion evidence consistent with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527, reevaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity, reevaluate the established onset date consistent with Social Security Ruling 83-20, if warranted obtain vocational expert evidence, take any further action to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision.

Id. at 1. In light of the foregoing, the Commissioner requests that her decision be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that an ALJ may perform the tasks detailed above. Id. at 1-2. The Motion is unopposed. Id. at 1. The undersigned finds the Motion well-taken.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that:

1. The Motion (Doc. 18) be GRANTED; 2. The final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) for the above stated reasons; and 3. The Clerk be directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and to close the case.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1. The parties may file a notice of no objection in they have no objection to this Report and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer