NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On May 22, 2017, Christine Pearson ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On August 15, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 42). Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $19,365.85 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $630.64. Id. at 1. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Id. at 2. Thus, the total amount requested is $19,996.49.
Respondent has not filed a response.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and finds it necessary to reduce the following attorney rates and hours billed.
With regard to Sabrina Knickelbein's requested hourly rate of $396 for work performed in 2018, the undersigned finds the proposed rate excessive based on her overall legal experience, the quality of work performed, her experience in the Vaccine Program, and her reputation in the legal community and the community at large. See McCulloch v. Health and Human Services, No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 at *17 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 1, 2015) (stating the following factors are paramount in deciding a reasonable forum hourly rate: experience in the Vaccine Program, overall legal experience, the quality of work performed, and the reputation in the legal community and community at large). The determination of the amount of reasonable attorneys' fees is within the special master's discretion. See, e.g., Saxton v. HHS, 3 F.3d 1517, 1520 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Special masters have "wide latitude in determining the reasonableness of both attorneys' fees and costs." Hines v. HHS, 22 Cl. Ct. 750, 753 (Fed. Cl. 1991). Moreover, special masters are entitled to rely on their own experience and understanding of the issues raised. Wasson v. HHS, 24 Cl. Ct. 482, 483 (Fed. Cl. 1991), aff'd in relevant part, 988 F.2d 131 (Fed.Cir.1993) (per curiam). Under the Court's Fee Schedule, an attorney in the range of 11 - 19 years of experience are entitled to hourly rates between $317 - $396 for work performed in 2018.
Ms. Knickelbein was awarded a rate of $378 per hour for work performed in 2017. Her increase for 2018, based on the Producer Price Index for the "Office of Lawyers" (PPI-OL), provided by the Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, would result in a rate of $391 per hour, which is a more appropriate rate given the undersigned's experience and analysis of the McCulloch factors. Therefore, the undersigned
Attorney Renee J. Gentry billed 0.2 hours in 2018 at a rate of $439 per hour. (ECF No. 42 at 13). The undersigned shall reduce Ms. Gentry's hourly rate to the previously awarded rate of $435 for 2018. See Simkiss v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-1127V, 2018 WL 1834197, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. February 22, 2018) (setting Ms. Gentry's rate for 2018). This results in
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.