Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vangemert v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00657-JCM-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181025741 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 18, 2018 to October 25, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for extension. Counsel has been out of the office on sick leave due to the flu/cold.
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 18, 2018 to October 25, 2018. This is Defendant's third request for extension. Counsel has been out of the office on sick leave due to the flu/cold. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but did not anticipate taking additional sick leave and made this request as soon as practicable. Due to current workload demands and unanticipated leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer