Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PRITCHARD v. RAMESES, INC., 6:15-cv-2059-Orl-31TBS. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160105770 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Seal Docket Entries 27-1 and 27-2 (Doc. 29) is DENIED without prejudice. Local Rule 1.09(a) requires that a motion to seal include (i) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing; (ii) the reason that filing each item is necessary; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the reason that a means other than sealing is unavailable or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest
More

ORDER

Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Seal Docket Entries 27-1 and 27-2 (Doc. 29) is DENIED without prejudice. Local Rule 1.09(a) requires that a motion to seal include

(i) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing; (ii) the reason that filing each item is necessary; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the reason that a means other than sealing is unavailable or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; (v) a statement of the proposed duration of the seal; and (vi) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal.

M.D. Fla. Local Rule 1.09(a). Defendants have made no attempt to comply with the Rule. In any renewed motion they must specifically address all of the factors set forth in Local Rule 3.01(g), and their motion must be supported by a memorandum of law as required by Local Rule 3.01(a).

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer