SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Leslie Chin's Motion to Have the Trial Judge Conduct Sentencing filed on June 7, 2016. (Doc. #200). The United States takes no position as to Defendant's motion. (Doc. #203). Thus, Defendant's motion is ripe for review.
On March 1, 2016, a jury found Defendant guilty of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine. (Doc. #182). The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Senior District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota presided over the trial which was held in Fort Myers, Florida. At that time, Judge Magnuson was a visiting judge on an inter-circuit assignment in the Middle District of Florida. The undersigned has set the Defendant's sentencing hearing for June 27, 2016.
Defendant moves for Judge Magnuson, instead of the undersigned, to hold the sentencing hearing. (Doc. #200). Defendant objects to the amount of drugs the presentence investigation report attributed to him for the purposes of calculating his base offense level. Because the Government established the drug amounts through co-conspirator witnesses at trial, Defendant argues that Judge Magnuson must conduct the sentencing.
After careful consideration of Defendant's motion, arguments, and applicable law, the Court denies Defendant's motion. Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure states, in pertinent part, that "[a]fter a verdict or finding of guilty, any judge regularly sitting in or assigned to a court may complete the court's duties if the judge who presided at trial cannot perform those duties because of absence, death, sickness, or other disability."
Here, Judge Magnuson is absent from this district. His inter-circuit assignment expired on or about April 30, 2016, and he currently sits in St. Paul, Minnesota. Furthermore, upon reading the presentence investigation report, trial transcripts, and hearing live testimony at the sentencing hearing, the Court will be familiarized with the evidence and legal issues involved in the case and will be able to impose a fair and appropriate sentence.
Accordingly, it is now