Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Campbell v. Briere, 6:17-cv-1036-Orl-TBS (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180815c37 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . This case comes before the Court without a hearing on Defendant's Daubert Motion, or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine, to Preclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Sean Mahan (Doc. 49). Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion and the time within to do so has expired. When a party fails to respond, that is an indication that the motion is unopposed. Foster v. The Coca-Cola Co., No. 6:14-cv-2102-Orl-40TBS, 2015 WL 3486008, at *1 (M.D. Fla. J
More

ORDER

This case comes before the Court without a hearing on Defendant's Daubert Motion, or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine, to Preclude Certain Testimony of Dr. Sean Mahan (Doc. 49). Plaintiff has not filed a response to the motion and the time within to do so has expired. When a party fails to respond, that is an indication that the motion is unopposed. Foster v. The Coca-Cola Co., No. 6:14-cv-2102-Orl-40TBS, 2015 WL 3486008, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 2, 2015); Jones v. Bank of Am., N.A., 564 Fed. Appx. 432, 434 (11th Cir. 2014)1 (citing Kramer v. Gwinnett Cty., Ga., 306 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1221 (N.D. Ga. 2004); Daisy, Inc. v. Polio Operations, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-564-FtM-38CM, 2015 WL 2342951, at *1 (M.D. Fla. May 14, 2015) (when defendant did not respond court could consider motion to compel unopposed); Brown v. Platinum Wrench Auto Repair, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-2168-T-33TGW, 2012 WL 333803, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 1, 2012) (after party failed to respond, court treated motion for summary judgment as unopposed). The Court proceeds on the basis that this motion is unopposed, and it is therefore, GRANTED without the Court having reached the merits. Plaintiff's expert, Dr. Sean Mahan will not be permitted to testify concerning the causation or permanency of Plaintiffs' injuries claimed in these actions.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. "Unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent, but may be cited as persuasive authority." CTA11 Rule 36-2.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer