Vangemert v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00657-JCM-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181009e68
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 4, 2018 to October 18, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Counsel is not feeling well on the date of the current filing deadlin
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 4, 2018 to October 18, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Counsel is not feeling well on the date of the current filing deadline..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from October 4, 2018 to October 18, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Counsel is not feeling well on the date of the current filing deadline and is getting migraine symptoms, which impairs her vision. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but cannot control the onset of her migraines and made this request as soon as practicable. Due to current workload demands and unanticipated leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
