NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On December 15, 2016, Emilia Silva ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On August 30, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 49). Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $37,169.30 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $767.60. Id. at 1. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Id. at 6. Thus, the total amount requested is $37,936.90.
On September 12, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. (ECF No. 51). Respondent argues that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he "is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case." Id. at 2. Respondent "respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 3.
On September 12, 2018, petitioner filed a reply. (ECF No. 52). Petitioner states that "Respondent has made no specific objection to Petitioner's application; therefore, Petitioner does not intend to file a substantive reply to respondent's response." Id at 1.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and finds it necessary to reduce the following hours billed.
The undersigned has previously reduced the fees paid to a petitioner's attorney due to excessive and duplicative billing. See Ericzon v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10-103V, 2016 WL 447770 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 15, 2016) (reducing overall fee award by 10% due to excessive and duplicative billing); Raymo v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 11-654V, 2016 WL 7212323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 2, 2016) (reducing overall fee award by 20%), mot. for rev. denied, 129 Fed. Cl. 691 (2016). The undersigned and other special masters have previously noted the inefficiency that results when cases are staffed by multiple individuals and have reduced fees accordingly. See Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). Here, billing records filed with the motion for attorneys' fees reflect 164 billing entries notated as reviewing documents, internal emails, meetings and/or telephone calls between the multiple attorneys and paralegals. As multiple attorneys and paralegals assisted in this case it also resulted in duplicate reviews of documents from petitioner and the court. The undersigned finds cause to reduce petitioner's overall fee award for the reasons listed above by 5 %. This results in a reduction of
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.