MEDLEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, 11-1893 (RWR). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20120409b95
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. On December 9, 2011, petitioner was ordered to respond by January 20, 2012, to respondents' opposition to his application for a writ of habeas corpus or risk dismissal of the case. On February 6, 2012, petitioner was given additional advisements and ordered to respond by March 5, 2012, or risk dismissal of the case. Petitioner has neither complied with the orders nor sought additional time to do so. 1 He therefore has conceded the United
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. On December 9, 2011, petitioner was ordered to respond by January 20, 2012, to respondents' opposition to his application for a writ of habeas corpus or risk dismissal of the case. On February 6, 2012, petitioner was given additional advisements and ordered to respond by March 5, 2012, or risk dismissal of the case. Petitioner has neither complied with the orders nor sought additional time to do so. 1 He therefore has conceded the United ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
On December 9, 2011, petitioner was ordered to respond by January 20, 2012, to respondents' opposition to his application for a writ of habeas corpus or risk dismissal of the case. On February 6, 2012, petitioner was given additional advisements and ordered to respond by March 5, 2012, or risk dismissal of the case. Petitioner has neither complied with the orders nor sought additional time to do so.1 He therefore has conceded the United States Parole Commission's ("USPC") argument establishing its jurisdiction over petitioner at the time of his parole revocation. See USPC's Opp'n to Pet'r's Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. # 8] at 5-8. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
FootNotes
1. Because petitioner failed in his responsibility to maintain a current address of record, the March 5, 2012, order was returned "as undeliverable." Clerk's Dkt. Entries 11, 12.
Source: Leagle
