Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mansilla v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-0861V. (2018)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20181024a04 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On June 23, 2017, Erwin Mansilla ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barr syndrome ("GBS") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to him on March 10, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Un
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On June 23, 2017, Erwin Mansilla ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome ("GBS") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered to him on March 10, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 6, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On July 27, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $80,346.00 (consisting of $78,000.00 in pain and suffering and $2,346.00 in out-of-pocket unreimbursed expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $ 80,346.00 (consisting of $78,000.00 in pain and suffering and $2,346.00 in out-of-pocket unreimbursed expenses), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Erwin Mansilla. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On March 6, 2018, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report, in which she conceded entitlement. On March 6, 2018, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation. Respondent now proffers that petitioner receive an award of a lump sum of $80,346.00 (consisting of $78,000.00 in pain and suffering and $2,346.00 in out of pocket unreimbursed expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled.1

Petitioner agrees with the proffered award of $80,346.00.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer