PHAZZER ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PROTECTIVE SOLUTIONS, INC., 6:15-cv-348-Orl-31DAB. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160222812
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 49), entered by Magistrate Judge David Baker on January 20, 2016, Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan and Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) and Defendants' Response in Opposition (Doc. 51). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker found that Plaintiff failed to show personal jurisdiction over any Defendant, and recomm
Summary: ORDER GREGORY A. PRESNELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 49), entered by Magistrate Judge David Baker on January 20, 2016, Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan and Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) and Defendants' Response in Opposition (Doc. 51). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker found that Plaintiff failed to show personal jurisdiction over any Defendant, and recomme..
More
ORDER
GREGORY A. PRESNELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 49), entered by Magistrate Judge David Baker on January 20, 2016, Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer to the Eastern District of Michigan and Objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) and Defendants' Response in Opposition (Doc. 51). In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Baker found that Plaintiff failed to show personal jurisdiction over any Defendant, and recommended that the Clerk's defaults entered against the Defendants be vacated, the Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be granted and the Complaint dismissed, with leave to amend against the corporate defendant only, and the motions for default judgment be denied as moot. Upon de novo review of the above, the Court concurs with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Court also finds that Plaintiff has failed to make a sufficient showing under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) for transfer.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that:
1) Plaintiff's Objection to the Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.
2) The Defaults entered by the Clerk are VACATED, and the Motions for Entry of Default Judgment are DENIED.
3) The Amended Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is GRANTED. The Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint against the corporate defendant by March 4, 2016
4) Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
