JORDAN v. ORMOND, 15-1536 (RMC). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20151202b44
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Dkt. 5. 1 On October 6, 2015, the Court issued an Order advising Plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to Defendant's motion, and specifically warned Plaintiff that, if she
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Dkt. 5. 1 On October 6, 2015, the Court issued an Order advising Plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to Defendant's motion, and specifically warned Plaintiff that, if she ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, Dkt. 5.1 On October 6, 2015, the Court issued an Order advising Plaintiff of her obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to Defendant's motion, and specifically warned Plaintiff that, if she did not respond to the motion by November 6, 2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. Order [Dkt. 8]. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion, requested more time to file her opposition, or advised the Court of any change of address. Accordingly, the Court will treat Defendants' motion as conceded and dismiss this case. An Order is issued separately.
FootNotes
1. On October 6, 2015, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, Dkt. 8.
Source: Leagle
