Schenone v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01655-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190131887
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2019
Summary: JOINT STPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from January 28, 2019 to March 5, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to the government shutdown, Counsel had to extend her Ninth Circuit brief, whi
Summary: JOINT STPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from January 28, 2019 to March 5, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to the government shutdown, Counsel had to extend her Ninth Circuit brief, whic..
More
JOINT STPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from January 28, 2019 to March 5, 2019. This is Defendant's second request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to the government shutdown, Counsel had to extend her Ninth Circuit brief, which required multiple levels of review including the U.S. Attorneys' Office. As a result of scheduling conflicts from the shutdown, Counsel had to extend her Ninth Circuit matter to make time for U.S. Attorney review. Counsel also has over 80+ active social security matters, which require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-March. Due to heavy caseload and unexpected leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but made her request as soon as reasonably practicable.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
Source: Leagle
