Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Auzenne v. Synchrony Bank, 2:17-cv-708-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180221h92 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration. (Doc. 14). The parties agree to submit all claims in this suit to arbitration per their arbitration agreement. Upon consideration of the parties' request and applicable law, the Court will compel binding non-judicial arbitration and stay this case. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Joint Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration. (Doc. 14). The parties agree to submit all claims in this suit to arbitration per their arbitration agreement. Upon consideration of the parties' request and applicable law, the Court will compel binding non-judicial arbitration and stay this case.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) The Joint Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. (2) All proceedings in this case are STAYED until the parties advise the Court that arbitration has been completed and that the stay is due to be lifted or the case is due to be dismissed. The parties must notify the Court of such matters within seven (7) days of the arbitration proceedings concluding. (3) The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report regarding the status of arbitration on or before May 21, 2018, and every ninety (90) days afterward until arbitration concludes. (4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to add a stay flag.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer