USA v. Crithfield, 8:13-cr-237-T-23TBM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180116a01
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY , District Judge . Jonathan David Christenbury moved (Docs. 389, 443, 457) for an award of restitution. Donaldson objects (Docs. 395, 420) to the motion and Crithfield joins the opposition. An October 20, 2017 order (Doc. 423) refers to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation the matter of restitution owed by each defendant. The magistrate conducted a hearing and issued a report (Doc. 474) recommending (1) denial of Christenbury's motion for restituti
Summary: ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY , District Judge . Jonathan David Christenbury moved (Docs. 389, 443, 457) for an award of restitution. Donaldson objects (Docs. 395, 420) to the motion and Crithfield joins the opposition. An October 20, 2017 order (Doc. 423) refers to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation the matter of restitution owed by each defendant. The magistrate conducted a hearing and issued a report (Doc. 474) recommending (1) denial of Christenbury's motion for restitutio..
More
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
Jonathan David Christenbury moved (Docs. 389, 443, 457) for an award of restitution. Donaldson objects (Docs. 395, 420) to the motion and Crithfield joins the opposition.
An October 20, 2017 order (Doc. 423) refers to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation the matter of restitution owed by each defendant. The magistrate conducted a hearing and issued a report (Doc. 474) recommending (1) denial of Christenbury's motion for restitution and (2) denial of the defendants' "Motion to Strike and/or Disallow" Christenbury's restitution claim (Doc. 467).*
Donaldson responds (Doc. 476) that he has no objection to the report and recommendation.
The report and recommendation (Doc. 474) is ADOPTED. Christenbury's motion (Docs. 389, 443, 457) is DENIED, and the defendants' motions (Docs. 461 and 467) to strike and to deny Christenbury's claim are DENIED.
ORDERED.
FootNotes
* The parties filed other documents (Docs. 422, 438, 444, 459, 461, 463, 465) related to Christenbury's motion.
Source: Leagle
