Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Crithfield, 8:13-cr-237-T-23TBM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20180116a01 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY , District Judge . Jonathan David Christenbury moved (Docs. 389, 443, 457) for an award of restitution. Donaldson objects (Docs. 395, 420) to the motion and Crithfield joins the opposition. An October 20, 2017 order (Doc. 423) refers to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation the matter of restitution owed by each defendant. The magistrate conducted a hearing and issued a report (Doc. 474) recommending (1) denial of Christenbury's motion for restituti
More

ORDER

Jonathan David Christenbury moved (Docs. 389, 443, 457) for an award of restitution. Donaldson objects (Docs. 395, 420) to the motion and Crithfield joins the opposition.

An October 20, 2017 order (Doc. 423) refers to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation the matter of restitution owed by each defendant. The magistrate conducted a hearing and issued a report (Doc. 474) recommending (1) denial of Christenbury's motion for restitution and (2) denial of the defendants' "Motion to Strike and/or Disallow" Christenbury's restitution claim (Doc. 467).*

Donaldson responds (Doc. 476) that he has no objection to the report and recommendation.

The report and recommendation (Doc. 474) is ADOPTED. Christenbury's motion (Docs. 389, 443, 457) is DENIED, and the defendants' motions (Docs. 461 and 467) to strike and to deny Christenbury's claim are DENIED.

ORDERED.

FootNotes


* The parties filed other documents (Docs. 422, 438, 444, 459, 461, 463, 465) related to Christenbury's motion.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer