Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bardman, 3:16-cv-02023 (JST). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160504a37 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 02, 2016
Latest Update: May 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS, EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with Plaintiff, the "Parties")
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS, EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, on April 18, 2016, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint in the above-captioned action (the "Complaint") asserting claims against defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf ("Defendants" and, together with Plaintiff, the "Parties");

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Defendants will accept service of the complaint, Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint may be extended and, with the Court's permission, the Parties have agreed to a briefing schedule with respect to any motions to dismiss the Complaint, as follows;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and the attorneys for Defendants, as follows:

1. Undersigned counsel for Defendants Erik K. Bardman and Jennifer F. Wolf are authorized to accept, and hereby do accept, service of the summons and Complaint in the above-captioned action on their behalf, without prejudice and without waiver of any of Defendants' defenses, objections or arguments in this matter or any other matter, except as to sufficiency of service of process.

2. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by July 25, 2016.

3. In the event that Defendants file one or more motions to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiff's opposition to any motions to dismiss shall be filed on or before August 25, 2016.

4. Defendants' reply briefs in support of any motions to dismiss the Complaint shall be filed on or before September 15, 2016.

5. The hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint, if any, shall be set for September 29, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

6. The Case Management Conference currently set for July 20, 2016 is rescheduled for October 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

There have been no requests for an extension of time previously made in this matter.

ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer