Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Waggerby, 2:19-cr-4-FtM-UAUAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20190619a43 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Sylvanis Brice's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 65), Uriah Waggerby's Motion for Bill of Particulars (Doc. 74), and the Government's response to both motions (Doc. 80). After Defendants filed their motions, a federal grand jury issued a Superseding Indictment against them. (Doc. 76). Because Defendants' motions attack the original indictment that is no longer operative, the Court denies their motions as mo
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Defendant Sylvanis Brice's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 65), Uriah Waggerby's Motion for Bill of Particulars (Doc. 74), and the Government's response to both motions (Doc. 80). After Defendants filed their motions, a federal grand jury issued a Superseding Indictment against them. (Doc. 76). Because Defendants' motions attack the original indictment that is no longer operative, the Court denies their motions as moot.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Sylvanis Brice's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. 65) is DENIED as moot. (2) Defendant Uriah Waggerby's Motion for Bill of Particulars (Doc. 74) is DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer