Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ruiz v. American Express National Bank, 2:18-cv-604-FtM-99MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181023952 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is the parties Joint Motion to Stay Action Pending Arbitration. (Doc. 16). The parties agree to submit all claims in this suit to arbitration per their arbitration provisions in the applicable cardmember agreement. Upon consideration of the parties' request and applicable law, the Court will refer this action to arbitration and stay the case. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: (1) The Joint Motion to Stay Action Pending Arbit
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is the parties Joint Motion to Stay Action Pending Arbitration. (Doc. 16). The parties agree to submit all claims in this suit to arbitration per their arbitration provisions in the applicable cardmember agreement. Upon consideration of the parties' request and applicable law, the Court will refer this action to arbitration and stay the case.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

(1) The Joint Motion to Stay Action Pending Arbitration (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. (2) All proceedings in this case are STAYED until the parties advise the Court that arbitration has been completed and that the stay is due to be lifted or the case is due to be dismissed. The parties must notify the Court of such matters within seven (7) days of the arbitration proceedings concluding. (3) The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report on the status of arbitration on or before January 16, 2019, and every ninety (90) days after until arbitration concludes. (4) The Clerk is DIRECTED to add a stay flag.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer