Jardine v. St. Clair, 2:15-cv-1749 MCE AC P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181015827
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On October 1, 2018, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed September 19, 2018, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. There
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On October 1, 2018, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed September 19, 2018, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Theref..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
On October 1, 2018, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed September 19, 2018, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed September 19, 2018, is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
