Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTINEZ v. TULARE COUNTY, 16-cv-01140-DAD-SKO. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170215a26 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 143, Plaintiff Maria Eva Martinez and Defendant County of San Diego (hereafter, the "parties") through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Court issued a Scheduling Order on December 2, 2016 (ECF 21); WHEREAS, in the Scheduling Order the Court set the following discovery or discovery-related deadlines: • Motions or stipulations requestin
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 143, Plaintiff Maria Eva Martinez and Defendant County of San Diego (hereafter, the "parties") through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Scheduling Order on December 2, 2016 (ECF 21);

WHEREAS, in the Scheduling Order the Court set the following discovery or discovery-related deadlines:

• Motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings on February 1, 2017; • Close of Non Expert Discovery on February 24, 2017; • Expert Disclosures on February 24, 2017; • Rebuttal Expert Disclosures on February 28, 2017; • Close of Expert Discovery on March 24, 2017; • Mid-Discovery Status Report on February 2, 2017; • Mid-Discovery Status Conference on February 9, 2017;

WHEREAS, the County of Tulare made an offer of judgment, which Plaintiff has accepted, resolving the dispute between the Plaintiff and the County of Tulare;

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order inadvertently closing the case on January 18, 2017 and vacating all dates;

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order re-opening the case as to Defendant County of San Diego, correcting the clerical error in the January 18, 2017 order closing the case, and inviting the parties to propose new case dates and deadlines;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that a short extension of the discovery and discovery-related dates is supported by good cause and is in the interests of justice.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective attorneys and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

The following discovery and discovery-related deadlines shall all be continued to the following dates:

1. Motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings on May 1, 2017; 2. Close of Non Expert Discovery on June 23, 2017; 3. Expert Disclosures on June 23, 2017; 4. Rebuttal Expert Disclosures on June 28, 2017; 5. Close of Expert Discovery on July 21, 2017; 6. Mid-Discovery Status Report on April 6, 2017; 7. Mid-Discovery Status Conference on April 13, 2017;

In the parties' mid-discovery status report, they will update the Court as to their progress with discovery and propose an agreed-upon full case schedule at that time (or their respective positions on a full case schedule, if an agreement cannot be reached).

By agreeing to the above continuation, the parties do not agree to forego any rights to seek additional relief related to the other party's delay or failure to participate in discovery.

ORDER

Based on the parties' above-stipulation, the Court's Scheduling Order (Doc. 21) is hereby MODIFIED as follows:

EVENT CURRENT DATE NEW DATE Deadline for motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the February 1, 2017 May 1, 2017 pleadings Non-expert discovery deadline February 24, 2017 June 23, 2017 Expert disclosures February 24, 2017 June 23, 2017 Rebuttal expert disclosures February 28, 2017 June 28, 2017 Expert discovery deadline March 24, 2017 July 21, 2017 Mid-Discovery Status Report Deadline February 2, 2017 April 6, 2017 Mid-Discovery Status Conference February 9, 2017 April 13, 2017

It is further ORDERED that the non-dispositive motion deadlines, dispositive motion deadlines, pretrial conference, and trial dates are hereby VACATED and shall be set at the Mid-Discovery Status Conference on April 13, 2017. In their Mid-Discovery Status Report, the parties shall propose dates for these events that are agreed to by all counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer