DAVIS v. SEC'Y, FLA. DEP'T OF CORR., 3:10cv385/MCR/CJK. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20130729729
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 20, 2012 (doc. 40). The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions as to which an objection has been made. 1 Having considered the report and
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 20, 2012 (doc. 40). The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions as to which an objection has been made. 1 Having considered the report and r..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 20, 2012 (doc. 40). The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions as to which an objection has been made.1
Having considered the report and recommendation and petitioner's objections, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Peter Anthony Davis in the Circuit Court for Walton County, Florida, Case No. 99-CF-0141 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Petitioner filed extensive objections (see doc. 44), which the undersigned carefully reviewed and considered.
Source: Leagle
