Slack v. Parball Newco LLC, 2:16-cv-02324-RFB-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180328e55
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF CORRECTED NOTICE OF THE PENDENCY OF THIS ACTION AND OTHER RELIEF (ECF 90) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate and agree to grant plaintiffs a 14-day extension to file and serve their Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Circulation of Corrected Notice of the Pendency of this Action and for Other Relief. Plaintiffs filed thei
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF CORRECTED NOTICE OF THE PENDENCY OF THIS ACTION AND OTHER RELIEF (ECF 90) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate and agree to grant plaintiffs a 14-day extension to file and serve their Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Circulation of Corrected Notice of the Pendency of this Action and for Other Relief. Plaintiffs filed their..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF CORRECTED NOTICE OF THE PENDENCY OF THIS ACTION AND OTHER RELIEF (ECF 90)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate and agree to grant plaintiffs a 14-day extension to file and serve their Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Circulation of Corrected Notice of the Pendency of this Action and for Other Relief. Plaintiffs filed their motion on March 6, 2018, and defendants filed their opposition on March 20, 2018 (ECF No. 92). Plaintiffs' reply is due on March 27, 2018. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, plaintiffs will have until Tuesday, April 10, 2018 to file their reply.
Plaintiffs' request for an extension of time is made to accommodate the schedule of plaintiffs' counsel, who will be out of the office and traveling through March 28, 2018. Plaintiffs' counsel is also arguing before the en banc Nevada Supreme Court on April 4, 2018 which will require preparation time. Accordingly, plaintiffs assert that their request is not made for any improper purpose or for delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
