Morningstar v. Battle, 4:19-cv-00239-SWW-JJV. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191122886
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff's claims regarding the medical care he received for his
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 2. Plaintiff's claims regarding the medical care he received for his ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
2. Plaintiff's claims regarding the medical care he received for his stomach and diet issues before November 27, 2015, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and he may PROCEED with those medical claims arising on or after that date.
3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
