Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Glass v. Model Screw Products, Inc., 8:15-cv-1358-T-36EAJ. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160414b10 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL , District Judge . This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on March 17, 2016 (Doc. 25). In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Jenkins recommends that (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Dkt. 22) be GRANTED; (2) Defendants' Alternative Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories (Dkt. 22) be DENIED as moot;
More

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins on March 17, 2016 (Doc. 25). In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Jenkins recommends that (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Dkt. 22) be GRANTED; (2) Defendants' Alternative Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories (Dkt. 22) be DENIED as moot; and (3) The Clerk of Court be directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants. All parties were furnished copies of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded the opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed.

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon this Court's independent examination of the file, it is determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 25) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution, or in the Alternative, to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories (Doc. 22) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (3) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is GRANTED; and Defendants' Alternative Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents and Interrogatories is DENIED as moot. (4) This case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. (5) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer