U.S. v. SAMBORSKI, 6:15-cr-71-Orl-41TBS. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150710913
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , District Judge . This case comes before the Court on Defendant Thomas Samborski III's Motion to Place Doc. 27-1 Under Seal (Doc. 29). The document in question is an attachment to Defendant's pending motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 27). Defendant argues that the attachment (Doc. 27-1), should be sealed because it contains information which, if made public, could compromise other ongoing criminal investigations. The Government does not oppose the motion. After an in
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , District Judge . This case comes before the Court on Defendant Thomas Samborski III's Motion to Place Doc. 27-1 Under Seal (Doc. 29). The document in question is an attachment to Defendant's pending motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 27). Defendant argues that the attachment (Doc. 27-1), should be sealed because it contains information which, if made public, could compromise other ongoing criminal investigations. The Government does not oppose the motion. After an ind..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on Defendant Thomas Samborski III's Motion to Place Doc. 27-1 Under Seal (Doc. 29). The document in question is an attachment to Defendant's pending motion to suppress evidence (Doc. 27). Defendant argues that the attachment (Doc. 27-1), should be sealed because it contains information which, if made public, could compromise other ongoing criminal investigations. The Government does not oppose the motion. After an independent review of a redacted version of Doc. 27-1, the Court finds Defendant's reason for sealing Doc. 27-1 outweighs the public's right of access to the information. Accordingly, the motion to seal is GRANTED. The Clerk shall SEAL Doc. 27-1 until further order by the Court.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
