Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CUNNINGHAM, 8:14-cr-133-T-23EAJ. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140807c09 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. The defendant's motion to suppress (Doc. 28) was referred to Magistrate Judge Jenkins for preparation of a report and recommendation. The United States opposes (Doc. 38) the motion to suppress. On June 18, 2014, Magistrate Judge Jenkins conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion, and on June 20, 2014, she issued her report (Doc. 46) recommending denial of the motion. Cunningham objected (Doc. 50) to the report, the United States responded (Doc. 58
More

ORDER

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.

The defendant's motion to suppress (Doc. 28) was referred to Magistrate Judge Jenkins for preparation of a report and recommendation. The United States opposes (Doc. 38) the motion to suppress. On June 18, 2014, Magistrate Judge Jenkins conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion, and on June 20, 2014, she issued her report (Doc. 46) recommending denial of the motion. Cunningham objected (Doc. 50) to the report, the United States responded (Doc. 58), and Cunningham replied (Doc. 73).

I have considered the motion; the response to the motion; the report and recommendation; the objection, response, and reply to the report and recommendation; and all exhibits. The objections (Doc. 50) are OVERRULED, the report and recommendation (Doc. 46) is ADOPTED, and the motion to suppress (Doc. 28) is DENIED.

ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer