DOE v. XYTEX CORPORATION, 8:16-cv-2091-T-27TBM. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20170515984
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Pursuant to Stipulated Protective Order Entered March 8, 2017. (Dkt. 77). The title of Plaintiff's motion is misleading. The parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order. (Dkt. 55). Their stipulation, however, was not accompanied by a motion seeking relief and was not entered by the Court. And, their mutual agreement to keep documents confidential or to seal materials is "immaterial" to a decision r
Summary: ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Pursuant to Stipulated Protective Order Entered March 8, 2017. (Dkt. 77). The title of Plaintiff's motion is misleading. The parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order. (Dkt. 55). Their stipulation, however, was not accompanied by a motion seeking relief and was not entered by the Court. And, their mutual agreement to keep documents confidential or to seal materials is "immaterial" to a decision re..
More
ORDER
JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Pursuant to Stipulated Protective Order Entered March 8, 2017. (Dkt. 77). The title of Plaintiff's motion is misleading. The parties filed a Stipulated Protective Order. (Dkt. 55). Their stipulation, however, was not accompanied by a motion seeking relief and was not entered by the Court. And, their mutual agreement to keep documents confidential or to seal materials is "immaterial" to a decision regarding the public's right of access. Brown v. Advantage Eng'g, 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). Upon consideration, the Motion (Dkt. 77) is DENIED for failure to comply with Local Rules 1.09(a) and 3.01(g).
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
