STATEN v. NEW LIFE ADULT CARE II, 8:14-cv-1063-T-30AEP. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150114f55
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli (Dkt. #22) and the Objections (Dkt. #24) filed thereto. After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Objections, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli (Dkt. #22) and the Objections (Dkt. #24) filed thereto. After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Objections, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli (Dkt. #22) and the Objections (Dkt. #24) filed thereto.
After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Objections, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Defendant's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be sustained. The corporate Defendant retained counsel after the issuance of the Report and Recommendation.
ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Defendant New Life Adult Care II, Inc.'s Objection to Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #24) is SUSTAINED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle