Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRADLEY v. UPLAND VENTURES, INC., 6:13-cv-1053-Orl-40DAB. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150225b41 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge. TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 58) FILED: January 21, 2015 THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. Defendants are not opposed to the relief sought in the Motion. Doc. 59. Judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this Fair Labor Standards Act case was entered on December 24,
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge.

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:

MOTION: Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. No. 58) FILED: January 21, 2015 THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. Defendants are not opposed to the relief sought in the Motion. Doc. 59.

Judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this Fair Labor Standards Act case was entered on December 24, 2014. On January 21, 2015, Plaintiff's attorney subsequently filed a Motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §216(b) seeking $14,805 in attorney's fees and $996.24 in costs. Doc. 58. Defendants are not opposed to the relief sought in the Motion. Doc. 59. The attorney's fees are now being sought separate and apart from the relief previously awarded to Plaintiff for unpaid overtime in the judgment.

It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that judgment on attorney's fees1 be entered in the amount of $15,551.44.

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal.

FootNotes


1. The amount sought by Plaintiff gives credit to the Defendants for their payment of $250 in sanctions imposed by the Court earlier in this case. Doc. 58 n. 1.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer