Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Abravaya, 1:16-cr-20274-UU. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20180220g41 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION URSULA UNGARO , District Judge . This Cause is before the Court upon Wilfredo Albanes' request for restitution and the United States of America's Memorandum Regarding Restitution (D.E. 56). THE COURT is fully advised in the premises. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan, who, on January 30, 2018, issued a Report (the "Report") (D.E. 64) recommending that Wilfredo Albanes' request for restitution be denied. The part
More

ORDER ON MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Cause is before the Court upon Wilfredo Albanes' request for restitution and the United States of America's Memorandum Regarding Restitution (D.E. 56).

THE COURT is fully advised in the premises.

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan, who, on January 30, 2018, issued a Report (the "Report") (D.E. 64) recommending that Wilfredo Albanes' request for restitution be denied. The parties were given fourteen days to file objections to the Report. None of the parties filed objections. See LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 145 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988) (holding that failure to file timely objections bars the parties from attacking factual findings on appeal).

Upon de novo review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge O'Sullivan's recommendation and concurs in all of his findings. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report, D.E. 64, is RATIFIED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the request for restitution on behalf of Wilfredo Albanes is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer