Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RIVERA-ALEJANDRO, 09-0165CCC. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Puerto Rico Number: infdco20140401771 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on February 19, 2014 ( docket entry 2560 ) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant Julio Alexis Ortiz-Berr os (15) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on February 19, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights
More

ORDER

CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation filed on February 19, 2014 (docket entry 2560) on a Rule 11 proceeding of defendant Julio Alexis Ortiz-Berríos (15) before U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce J. McGiverin on February 19, 2014, to which no objection has been filed, the same is APPROVED. Accordingly, the plea of guilty of defendant is accepted. The Court FINDS that his plea was voluntary and intelligently entered with awareness of his rights and the consequences of pleading guilty and contains all elements of the offense charged in the indictment. Defendant is advised, however, that the Court will defer its decision on whether to accept or reject the parties' Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement until it has reviewed the Pre-Sentence Report.

This case was referred to the U.S. Probation Office for preparation of a Presentence Investigation Report since February 19, 2014. The sentencing hearing is set for May 20, 2014 at 4:15 PM.

The U.S. Probation Officer is reminded that, should any objections be raised by defendant to the PreSentence Report, the Addendum to said PreSentence Report must specifically identify any unresolved objections, the grounds for the objections, and the U.S. Probation Officer's comments on them, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g). The party that raised the unresolved objections shall, within twenty-four (24) hours after the Addendum is disclosed, state in writing whether it will insist that the unresolved objections be ruled upon by the Court. Failure to do so will be deemed by the Court as a withdrawal of the unresolved objections.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer