U.S. v. Smith, 8:95-cr-317-T-26TGW. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180307b16
Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA , District Judge . UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural history of this case together with Defendant's submissions, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion Requesting for Order of Immediate Release or Time Served (Dkt. 250) is denied because Defendant has failed to demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Bureau of Prisons. See Hicks v. Jordan, 165 F. App'x 797 (11th Cir. 2006) (unpublished). DONE AND O
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. LAZZARA , District Judge . UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural history of this case together with Defendant's submissions, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion Requesting for Order of Immediate Release or Time Served (Dkt. 250) is denied because Defendant has failed to demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Bureau of Prisons. See Hicks v. Jordan, 165 F. App'x 797 (11th Cir. 2006) (unpublished). DONE AND OR..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. LAZZARA, District Judge.
UPON DUE AND CAREFUL CONSIDERATION of the procedural history of this case together with Defendant's submissions, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion Requesting for Order of Immediate Release or Time Served (Dkt. 250) is denied because Defendant has failed to demonstrate that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Bureau of Prisons. See Hicks v. Jordan, 165 F. App'x 797 (11th Cir. 2006) (unpublished).
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
