DROSKE v. GARCIA-CANO, 5:10-cv-618-Oc-10TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120618512
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 15, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Copies (Doc. 81). The request is hereby STRICKEN for the following reasons: (1) Plaintiff has not provided a reason why the request was filed. Local Rule 3.03 provides in part that discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court as a matter of course, but may be filed if necessary to the presentation and consideration of a motion to compel, a motion for summary judgment, a motion fo
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Copies (Doc. 81). The request is hereby STRICKEN for the following reasons: (1) Plaintiff has not provided a reason why the request was filed. Local Rule 3.03 provides in part that discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court as a matter of course, but may be filed if necessary to the presentation and consideration of a motion to compel, a motion for summary judgment, a motion for..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Copies (Doc. 81). The request is hereby STRICKEN for the following reasons:
(1) Plaintiff has not provided a reason why the request was filed. Local Rule 3.03 provides in part that discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court as a matter of course, but may be filed if necessary to the presentation and consideration of a motion to compel, a motion for summary judgment, a motion for injunctive relief, or other similar proceeding.
(2) This case is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff's request is made pursuant to the Florida Rules.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
