ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF No. 41)

ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Eric Darnell Joy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1). On December 11, 2017, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and recommendations recommending that all claims and defendants, except for Plaintiff's claims for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Laszuk, Valdez, and Garcia, be dismissed. (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days. On December 28, 2017, Chief District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill adopted the findings and recommendations in full. (ECF No. 40).

On January 8, 2018, Plaintiff filed "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations," in which he requests an extension of time to object to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 41). Plaintiff states that he did not receive a copy of the findings and recommendations until December 19, 2017, because his mail was routed through his previous institution of confinement.

As the findings and recommendations have been adopted in full, the Court declines to extend Plaintiff's time to file objections. The Court notes that the findings and recommendations are consistent with the Court's prior order, (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff may continue to proceed on his claims for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Laszuk, Valdez, and Garcia as set forth in his First Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 12).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.