Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hofstetter, 3:15-CR-27-TAV-DCP. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20180409c54 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . This criminal matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. [Doc. 275]. In the R&R, Judge Shirley recommends that the Court deny the defendants' Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 171]. The parties have not timely objected, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)
More

ORDER

This criminal matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. [Doc. 275]. In the R&R, Judge Shirley recommends that the Court deny the defendants' Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 171]. The parties have not timely objected, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

After reviewing the matter, the Court is in agreement with Judge Shirley's recommendation and reasoning, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 275]. The defendants' Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Doc. 171] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED NUNC PRO TUNC February 15, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer