Association of Equipment Manufacturers v. Burgum, 1:17-cv-151. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. North Dakota
Number: infdco20170817c31
Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2017
Summary: CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO BOTH COMPLAINT AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before this Court pursuant to the unopposed motion for an extension of time for Defendants, The Honorable Doug Burgum, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Dakota ("Governor Burgum"), and the Honorable Wayne Stenehjem, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota (the "Attorn
Summary: CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO BOTH COMPLAINT AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter came before this Court pursuant to the unopposed motion for an extension of time for Defendants, The Honorable Doug Burgum, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Dakota ("Governor Burgum"), and the Honorable Wayne Stenehjem, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota (the "Attorne..
More
CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO BOTH COMPLAINT AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION
CHARLES S. MILLER, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter came before this Court pursuant to the unopposed motion for an extension of time for Defendants, The Honorable Doug Burgum, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Dakota ("Governor Burgum"), and the Honorable Wayne Stenehjem, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota (the "Attorney General") (collectively, the "State"), to respond to the Complaint (Dkt. # 1) and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. # 9) filed by Plaintiffs, the Association of Equipment Manufacturers ("AEM"), AGCO Corporation ("AGCO"), CNH Industrial America LLC ("CNH"), Deere & Company ("John Deere"), and Kubota Tractor Corporation ("Kubota") (collectively, the "Manufacturers").
By agreement of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The time for the State to respond to both the Complaint and the Manufacturers' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is hereby extended until September 30, 2017 (the "Extension Period").
2. During the Extension Period, and without prejudice to any arguments that the State might later assert in response to the Complaint or in opposition to the Manufacturers' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, the Attorney General shall not seek to enforce or institute an action for any alleged violation of any of the provisions of Senate Bill 2289 until the Court has ruled on the merits of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
