Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shue v. Saul, 3:18cv512/LAC/EMT. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20190812579 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 23, 2019 (ECF No. 32). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 23, 2019 (ECF No. 32). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED.

3. The JUDGMENT is entered, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner.

4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer